View Poll Results: What is your favorite Radio Code

Voters
181. This poll is closed
  • .65 (4.0.0.76)

    2 1.10%
  • .90 (4.0.0.114)

    21 11.60%
  • .109 (4.0.0.136)

    26 14.36%
  • .113 (4.0.0.144)

    1 0.55%
  • .114 (4.0.0.143)

    2 1.10%
  • .122 (4.0.0.153)

    3 1.66%
  • .132 (4.0.0.162)

    64 35.36%
  • .141 (4.0.0.174)

    17 9.39%
  • .148 (4.0.0.181)

    28 15.47%
  • .151 (4.0.0.186)

    17 9.39%
Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 9 to 16 of 88

  1. #9
    rasputin's Avatar
    rasputin is offline BlackBerryOS Gifted
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Kentwood, Michigan
    Device
    9530
    OS
    Ask Lou.
    Posts
    405
    What does bbcm's have? Whatever base we install them on or one he picks for his versions...



  2. #10
    bbcrackman's Avatar
    bbcrackman is offline BlackBerryOS Grand Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    PIN
    yes
    Device
    9000/9530/9630/
    OS
    5.0.0.3xx
    Posts
    2,902
    Quote Originally Posted by rasputin View Post
    What does bbcm's have? Whatever base we install them on or one he picks for his versions...
    It all depends on what runs well on your device. These phones have a personallity of their own. I actually have two favorites, .109 and .132. Both have performed well in my device. I havent really run the 141 sfi file for that long, but I can tell you that it pixalates at random which is I have ventured elsewhere with the radio file.

  3. #11
    rasputin's Avatar
    rasputin is offline BlackBerryOS Gifted
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Kentwood, Michigan
    Device
    9530
    OS
    Ask Lou.
    Posts
    405
    But if we install one of you birds what one are we running?



  4. #12
    jlevy73's Avatar
    jlevy73 is offline BlackBerryOS Einstein
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Device
    9630/9550/9530/
    Posts
    8,538
    Quote Originally Posted by rasputin View Post
    But if we install one of you birds what one are we running?
    v4 runs 132. I believe v3.5 had 113 but BBC has also created a v3.5 that used 109 as well.

  5. #13
    jlevy73's Avatar
    jlevy73 is offline BlackBerryOS Einstein
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Device
    9630/9550/9530/
    Posts
    8,538
    Quote Originally Posted by HarlyFan View Post
    Here are 2 guys that are authorities on this and I have 3 different opinions. jlevy you say .113 and .109 and Stiefler you say .109. it seems as though the recommendation is .109 but can either of you tell me why. I have .132 now for about the last hour and not sure if its worth it to change again without some more input from you both.....
    As BBC pointed out it just depends on what works best for you. Also a lot depends on your location, 3rd party apps, themes etc. Everyone can agree to disagree on which SFI worked best for them. I didn't like 132 because I got poor signal strength and big time battery drain. 141 was just awful for me. .113 and .109 were very close in terms of signal strength and battery longevity. As you know these Storms really have a personality of their own. The only to determine which SFI is the best is to try them out yourself and make your own determination.

    Quote Originally Posted by HarlyFan View Post
    Here are 2 guys that are authorities on this and I have 3 different opinions. jlevy you say .113 and .109 and Stiefler you say .109. it seems as though the recommendation is .109 but can either of you tell me why. I have .132 now for about the last hour and not sure if its worth it to change again without some more input from you both.....
    Before changing your radio I would give it another day or two. It takes the OS's some time to settle in so give it a while longer and see what you think of 132 before making any changes.
    Last edited by Neolantis; 05-05-2009 at 02:40 AM. Reason: Same quote



  6. #14
    HarlyFan's Avatar
    HarlyFan is offline BlackBerryOS Gifted
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Powell, Ohio
    PIN
    It on the JACKASS!
    Device
    9530 Storm 9550 Storm2
    OS
    5.0.0.530 by Lyricidal
    Posts
    469
    Well .132 is without a doubt working better for me than .141 but it still is not giving me a strong signal at my home location, I am usually at 3 bars. I will give it another day to see if that changes and then I will try either .113 or .109. I think on what I'm seeing here I'm leaning towards .109

  7. #15
    lauterbock is offline BlackBerryOS Friend
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Device
    storm 9530
    OS
    Hybrid V5.1 .132
    Posts
    26
    I tried to use swap a radio from .132 to .109 on v4 and the lag time just killed me. What is the best way to go back to .109? Go back to 3.5V .109? I like V4 .132 because it is stable and no lag time and I have ran it 48 hrs with out a battery pull. But signal drops, battery drain, and memory leaks is a big down flaw with this system. I have had the best luck with the .109, but what is the best way to load the .109 radio with v4 and not have all of the lag time?

  8. #16
    Bryan is offline BlackBerryOS Einstein Follow Bryan On Twitter
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Boise
    Posts
    8,535
    Quote Originally Posted by bbcrackman View Post
    It all depends on what runs well on your device. These phones have a personallity of their own. I actually have two favorites, .109 and .132. Both have performed well in my device. I havent really run the 141 sfi file for that long, but I can tell you that it pixalates at random which is I have ventured elsewhere with the radio file.
    that is good to know BB :banana:

    I just started noticing that and forgot I was running .141 radio LOL. Looks like I have some more tweaking in my future.

Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •