Thread: Newest Internal Storm 2 OS...

Originally Posted by olta777

Wirelessly posted



You mean my screen shot wasn't enough? :17: :17:

...but :17: I agree :17:

*sob*

:lmao:

It was awesome Olta. But it's outdated now.:laugh2:

Wirelessly posted

Originally Posted by Natemz

Originally Posted by olta777

Wirelessly posted



You mean my screen shot wasn't enough? :17: :17:

...but :17: I agree :17:

*sob*

:lmao:

It was awesome Olta. But it's outdated now.:laugh2:

Oh you mean expired

That was just to let you know.

Wirelessly posted

Originally Posted by xplode

As a matter of fact theres no guarantee that the Storm 2 will launch with 5.1 and it will more likely launch with 5.0.0.XXX since rim is no longer making 5.1

9550 isn't gonna launch with 5.0. Its gonna be a 5.1 build, and RIM is still cooking up 5.1 builds, if they weren't that would stop the OS on a few other devices. Pretty sure Dakota is one of those devices.

Originally Posted by ausch

Wirelessly posted



9550 isn't gonna launch with 5.0. Its gonna be a 5.1 build, and RIM is still cooking up 5.1 builds, if they weren't that would stop the OS on a few other devices. Pretty sure Dakota is one of those devices.

OS 5.1 has been dropped by RIM. it will not have 5.1 at launch.

Wirelessly posted

Originally Posted by xplode

Originally Posted by ausch

Wirelessly posted



9550 isn't gonna launch with 5.0. Its gonna be a 5.1 build, and RIM is still cooking up 5.1 builds, if they weren't that would stop the OS on a few other devices. Pretty sure Dakota is one of those devices.

OS 5.1 has been dropped by RIM. it will not have 5.1 at launch.

That's right!

Wirelessly posted

Hmm, let me ask quick.

Edit: Seems like that its wrong. :? Wonder what's gonna happen with the other devices with the OS's.

Wirelessly posted

5.2?

Originally Posted by ausch

Wirelessly posted

Hmm, let me ask quick.

Edit: Seems like that its wrong. :? Wonder what's gonna happen with the other devices with the OS's.

Seems like what is wrong?

Wirelessly posted

That 5.1 was still getting cooked up.

Originally Posted by ausch

Wirelessly posted

Hmm, let me ask quick.

Edit: Seems like that its wrong. :? Wonder what's gonna happen with the other devices with the OS's.

Other devices?? Enlighten me? Which device and what bundle number? I'd like to know which devices you think are using 5.1 and which bundle they're using.

5.1 was dropped back to 5.0 almost two weeks ago. Everyone also needs to remember that its just a label really. Like 4.5 is really 4.3, 4.7.3 is really 5.0, etc etc. The main most important change with this roll back is that the Platform dropped from 4.3 to 4.2. If you notice the entire 95xx series is a bit behind other devices with 5.0 as the have entered into Platform 5.x. The kernel is still basically the same, but the other ones are still ahead.

Wirelessly posted

Not saying I'm 100% on everything, but I think I heard before there were some other devices with 5.1. I could be wrong though.

Originally Posted by ausch

Wirelessly posted

Not saying I'm 100% on everything, but I think I heard before there were some other devices with 5.1. I could be wrong though.

No mate wasn't meaning it like that. I was just asking which devices and what version number. You are correct in that some have/are used/using 5.1. But things have changed a bit and things are being re-worked. There may be/are some using 5.1, but its not for sure going to stay like that.
For instance, 5.1 being dropped for almost 2 weeks, but today is the first anyone heard about it. That's all. Wasn't trying to come off like a jerk or anything. Its just recently things have changed up quite a bit.

Originally Posted by Crucial

No mate wasn't meaning it like that. I was just asking which devices and what version number. You are correct in that some have/are used/using 5.1. But things have changed a bit and things are being re-worked. There may be/are some using 5.1, but its not for sure going to stay like that.
For instance, 5.1 being dropped for almost 2 weeks, but today is the first anyone heard about it. That's all. Wasn't trying to come off like a jerk or anything. Its just recently things have changed up quite a bit.

It must give you a headache keeping track of all that info. lol

Originally Posted by Neolantis

It must give you a headache keeping track of all that info. lol

I was thinking the same thing. How the heck does anyone keep track of all the changes.

Originally Posted by Neolantis

It must give you a headache keeping track of all that info. lol

Ah, its second nature as I work with/around it everyday. What's worse is knowing things and not being able to say anything. That's the real killer.

Wirelessly posted

Ahh, okay! Totally misunderstood you man. This was a while ago, but I believe the Magnum/Dakota device was one of the said 5.1 devices. Not too sure on other devices, but I'm gonna take a shot in the dark here and go with saying the other pure touch devices might run a 5.1 build.

Originally Posted by ausch

Wirelessly posted

Ahh, okay! Totally misunderstood you man. This was a while ago, but I believe the Magnum/Dakota device was one of the said 5.1 devices. Not too sure on other devices, but I'm gonna take a shot in the dark here and go with saying the other pure touch devices might run a 5.1 build.

That is incorrect. There was no such software announced for any device like that.

Originally Posted by xplode

That is incorrect. There was no such software announced for any device like that.

Hello xplode...I think ausch was handing out his opinion. "shot in the dark".
On another note. There is plenty of time to change platforms between now and the tentatively scheduled release dates. Technology is reinventing itself almost daily.

Originally Posted by MePascal

Hello xplode...I think ausch was handing out his opinion. "shot in the dark".
On another note. There is plenty of time to change platforms between now and the tentatively scheduled release dates. Technology is reinventing itself almost daily.

i was just referring to the magnum/dakota device. No mention has been made of the software used at this point. the second part of his post was not what i was responding to.