Thread: Does RIM's Success Mean Abandoning The BlackBerry?

Suggesting that RIM needs to ditch its BlackBerry handset business seems to be quickly gaining favor among a small amount of RIM's shareholders. It may seem like a bold statement, but that's what technology experts and investors are saying.

Poor sales and decreasing stock value have gotten many investors a little nervous about the future of RIM. Jaguar Financial an activist shareholder for the company stated that the "road map to value restoration lies in a sale of RIM whether as a whole or in separate parts," These parts to include its handset business. Jaguar also suggested a change within RIM's leadership stating that the company needed a new "transformational" leader.

Let's face it, we have heard these kind of bold predictions and statements before. What makes this one any different from the ones we have heard?

Declining sales. Whether you're a Blackberry fan like me or not, looking at whats really going behind the scenes is important to this theory. The bottom line is that BlackBerry device sales are poor. BlackBerry phones accounted for just 9 percent of the United States’ smartphone market in the third quarter of this year, compared with 24 percent during the same period a year ago, according to market research firm Canalys.

PlayBook reception. The BlackBerry PlayBook is one of the most advanced tablets on the market today, but the public has not accepted it. Why is this? Is it lack of apps or advertising? Maybe it was the rocky start back in April that had us PlayBook owners wondering whether we should return our devices. In the last conference call to investors RIM stated that its third quarter net income fell 71 percent. This is mainly due to the giveaway pricing that the PlayBook has had, good for consumers but bad for business.

A superior infrastructure. The one thing that RIM has done right from the start is keep up a backbone of security and a superior infrastructure. This is precisely what analyst and experts are suggesting that RIM focus on. Instead of concentrating on handheld devices RIM should be focusing on its enterprise software and start allowing more companies to use its back-end secure network. "There is a massive under-utilised asset in the services infrastructure which is very profitable. I think they are getting ready to come to market with a way to leverage that," said a U.S. fund manager.

The strategic reasoning behind all of this goes something like this: "Why build a staid Volvo or a flashy Ferrari when you can own the toll highway on which they drive?" - Reuters

The key's to RIM's success in 2012 depends on a, strategic launch of BlackBerry 10 smartphones, more cross-platformcollaboration like mobile fusion, and a more profitable use of RIM's infrastructure to.

source

Definitely there will be some change. It's going to be a crazy 2012 for RIM.

Seasons Greetings to all the BBOS family! As a BB user I've been following the latest news, rumours and discussions on this site, figured I should join and put my two cents in the mix. I'm of the opinion that in order for RIM to reverse their poor fortunes, they should approach the smartphone 180* from what all the other players in the arena are doing; RIM should produce purpose built smartphones! One for business, the Bold series, one for multimedia/gaming, the Torch series and one general purpose phone, perhaps a slider like the Torch 9800/9810. That approach is very successful in the desktop and laptop markets, it could revolutionise the smartphone market.

Originally Posted by DonMariano

Seasons Greetings to all the BBOS family! As a BB user I've been following the latest news, rumours and discussions on this site, figured I should join and put my two cents in the mix. I'm of the opinion that in order for RIM to reverse their poor fortunes, they should approach the smartphone 180* from what all the other players in the arena are doing; RIM should produce purpose built smartphones! One for business, the Bold series, one for multimedia/gaming, the Torch series and one general purpose phone, perhaps a slider like the Torch 9800/9810. That approach is very successful in the desktop and laptop markets, it could revolutionise the smartphone market.

I think that creating purpose built smartphone's is actually a good idea. I always thought having two separate lines of phones would be a good move.

Seasons Greetings BBOS family! I'm new to this site, figured I would put my two cents in the mix. It's my opinion that RIM should take an approach 180* from what all the other players in the smartphone arena are doing; rather than building a one-device-fits-all phone that tries to do everything equally well, like the iphone and a host of androids, they should focus on producing three full feature, purpose built superphones. A business phone with full qwerty keyboard (Bold series), a multimedia/gaming phone with full touch screen (Torch series) and a general purpose phone, perhaps a slider (Curve series). That approach has been successful in the desktop and laptop markets, it should work in the superphone market too. Build the phones with the highest quality materials, pack them with the most powerful and efficient chipsets, install the killer BB10 OS, pre-install all the ancillary bells and whistles (video chat, voice activation, NFA, etc), price them competitively and market them as the greatest things since sex. The 2012 roadmap, the "leaked" images of the London and the Milan and the delay in the release of the BB10 phones suggests that's exactly what RIM is doing.

Welcome to BBOS, Don! Thanks for the feedback, definitely an interesting theory. Do you think the designs of the Milan and London are final?

Thanks Joe, you have a great site. I don't think so. RIM is going with the P'9981 theme because they want their new devices to stand out from the crowd, but they also want the designs to be a hit so they leaked those pics to gauge public opinion.

this is unlikely to happen