I agree with you both, but they did give it a great review overall - just the camera issue they talked of seems to be an issue some others are talking about too. I was just hoping that its a software issue,and it can be addressed. It would suck for a 5MP camera to have an issue that wouldn't be fixable - but it seems like it's not hardware, so that's a good thing!
ive heard of this also in quite a few different places... (ive been diggin up everything, aswell as reading every lil thing Cat posts..)
Originally Posted by jlevy73
2.1 is already in developmet and is said to be a "bug fixer" update to 2.0.
2.0 will still be the "base OS" with the .1 just updating the lil things in the known issues list.
For all those asking about the camera, after playing with the Droid for 30 minutes I thought the picture quality was awesome compared to the S2. And the S2 does snap some pretty good photos IMO. Could be that CNET had a bad unit or mine was good, either way we will all find out together 11/6.
HAHAHA..... this is the funiest $h!t ive ever read....
You want one word to describe the screen? Stunning. A 3.7″ WVGA 854×480 capacitive high-quality display? We’ll take three. Like we said in our preview, it’s the best screen we’ve ever seen on an Android device and possibly in general.
(then at the end of that section)...
As we said, it’s second only to the iPhone as far as capacitive screens go, and coupled with the rest of the DROID, it’s a real winner.
I love how thay say its the best screen on an ANDROID phone... well duh, its the NEWEST THING OUT... but then... they say its second to the iPhone... that has nearly HALF the resolution???? I laugh at these iPhone bias'd, BLEEEEEEEEPS...
I could be wrong but I thought they meant best screen as far as picture and video quality and 2nd to Iphone in responsiveness.
Originally Posted by Drukan
you are right,but the last line i quoted was them saying in general its still 2nd as far as capacitive screens go. this is what i was getting at. they made a comparison, then claimed victory to the iPhone on 2 completely different "features". One is bigger, with higher resolution, and quality. yet the other only has responsiveness? to make it superior?!?
Originally Posted by terribL_T
For an "official review" this seems a whole lot more like a comparison/ judgment on whether its "better than an iPhone"
On a similar note... Have you all not noticed that when it comes to ANY review of the latest "touchscreen" phones out there, they HAVE to compare it to the iPhone???
WHEN DID THE iPHONE BECOME INDUSTRY STANDARD????? IF I CARED ABOUT AN iPHONE SO MUCH ID GO BUY IT, INSTEAD OF A BB OR AN ANDROID....
(ok im done ranting... sorry)
Tags for this Thread