Page 10 of 25 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 73 to 80 of 196

  1. #73
    miami1683's Avatar
    miami1683 is offline BlackBerryOS Gifted
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Daytona Beach
    Device
    Droid
    OS
    Android 2.0
    Posts
    278
    Quote Originally Posted by olta777 View Post
    .323 failed testing.



    Posted via BlackBerry device
    Why am I not surprised



  2. #74
    markdental's Avatar
    markdental is offline BlackBerryOS Gifted
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Device
    Storm 9530
    Posts
    285
    I honestly think the date is still up in the air.

    It will be .328 for sure.

    A memory leak won't fail an OS, every OS has had a memory leak including .148. So if .328 has a memory leak like the browser of .323 does, it would not fail due to that.

    .323 likely failed due to the VVM problems it was having. Verizon will not let a build pass that has a bug that does not allow users to use features where Verizon can make more money e.g. VVM.

  3. #75
    Le0_Br4zuC4's Avatar
    Le0_Br4zuC4 is offline BlackBerryOS Gifted
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Miami
    PIN
    30FB551F
    Device
    BlackBerry Stor
    OS
    5.0.0.320
    Posts
    398
    Do I smell leak?



  4. #76
    Marathon14's Avatar
    Marathon14 is offline BlackBerryOS Inspired
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Device
    Verizon Storm 9530
    OS
    9550 (Storm 2) - 320 Shrunken
    Posts
    227
    Quote Originally Posted by markdental View Post
    I honestly think the date is still up in the air.

    It will be .328 for sure.

    A memory leak won't fail an OS, every OS has had a memory leak including .148. So if .328 has a memory leak like the browser of .323 does, it would not fail due to that.

    .323 likely failed due to the VVM problems it was having. Verizon will not let a build pass that has a bug that does not allow users to use features where Verizon can make more money e.g. VVM.
    That's for sure. I just wonder why not jusl leak sooner and more often? What better way to Beta test than all of us? Ex. I had noticed the vvm issue 1/2 an hour after I loaded 323

  5. #77
    MedicConnor is offline BlackBerryOS Friend
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    19
    the only problem I have had with that version is teathering problems with vz access manager.



  6. #78
    medic0906's Avatar
    medic0906 is offline BlackBerryOS Inspired
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    CT
    PIN
    311FA49B
    Device
    storm 2 9550
    OS
    5.0.0.428 hybrid (428/442/451)
    Posts
    134
    Wirelessly posted (STORM 9530)

    Quote Originally Posted by Marathon14
    Quote Originally Posted by markdental View Post
    I honestly think the date is still up in the air.

    It will be .328 for sure.

    A memory leak won't fail an OS, every OS has had a memory leak including .148. So if .328 has a memory leak like the browser of .323 does, it would not fail due to that.

    .323 likely failed due to the VVM problems it was having. Verizon will not let a build pass that has a bug that does not allow users to use features where Verizon can make more money e.g. VVM.
    That's for sure. I just wonder why not jusl leak sooner and more often? What better way to Beta test than all of us? Ex. I had noticed the vvm issue 1/2 an hour after I loaded 323
    Ya know I often wonder why they don't leak stuff to. Or have a beta test site for os's that they are considering. Imho most BB owners don't mess with their os unless an official push is done, and even then a lot of owners have to be told/walked through an offical upgrade. People who are going to DL leaks are in large, smart enough and capable enough to wipe and reinstall if a leak is bad enough.

    Im sure that there would have to be some sort of release of liability on big reds part. Given that, there is a huge untapped resource in all of us to test possible os's with different app configurations.

    Just my 2 cents, Ok ill stop day dreaming. Lol

  7. #79
    Rellims's Avatar
    Rellims is offline BlackBerryOS Fanatic Follow Rellims On Twitter
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Denver
    PIN
    EAPPLE...Y
    Device
    9550
    OS
    5.0.whatever is newe
    Posts
    1,102
    Quote Originally Posted by medic0906 View Post
    Wirelessly posted (STORM 9530)



    Ya know I often wonder why they don't leak stuff to. Or have a beta test site for os's that they are considering. Imho most BB owners don't mess with their os unless an official push is done, and even then a lot of owners have to be told/walked through an offical upgrade. People who are going to DL leaks are in large, smart enough and capable enough to wipe and reinstall if a leak is bad enough.

    Im sure that there would have to be some sort of release of liability on big reds part. Given that, there is a huge untapped resource in all of us to test possible os's with different app configurations.

    Just my 2 cents, Ok ill stop day dreaming. Lol
    Most beta tests are very controlled and findings should be well documented. For all of variables each of us have regarding usage and apps we could not be considered reliable beta testers as large group IMHO. However I think most of us would willingly sign up as official beta testers if we were allowed to.:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

  8. #80
    Natemz's Avatar
    Natemz is offline BlackBerryOS Wizard Follow Natemz On Twitter
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Nashville, Tennessee
    PIN
    DROOOOIIII
    Device
    Droid X
    Posts
    3,210
    Wirelessly posted (storm 9530)

    Come on! Someone out there has 328. Don't make us wait until Monday. :banghead:

Page 10 of 25 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •